• Re: "Only The Little People Pay Taxes"

    From AlleyCat@katt@gmail.com to alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.democrats,talk.politics.misc on Sat Apr 18 22:35:32 2026
    From Newsgroup: talk.politics.misc


    On Sun, 19 Apr 2026 02:15:54 +0000, Mitchell Holman says...

    False dichotomy.



    But at least he didn't go into
    his "well, what about Biden" escape...

    You mean the exact same way you liberals went, "well, what about Trump" when Biden was president?

    I can't believe you guys are being that fucking hypocritical in projecting what YOU did. You faggots did the exact same thing you're whining about now .

    I have the receipts, do you wanna see them?

    How many would you like to see?

    Ya... thought so.

    =============================================================================

    "Trump Derangement Syndrome" Is a Real Mental Condition

    All you need to know about "Trump Derangement Syndrome," or TDS.

    "Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) is a mental condition in which a person has been driven effectively insane due to their dislike of Donald Trump, to the point at which they will abandon all logic and reason."

    Justin Raimondo, the editorial director of Antiwar.com, wrote a piece in the Los Angeles Times in 2016 that broke TDS down into three distinct phases or stages:

    "In the first stage of the disease, victims lose all sense of proportion. The president-elect's every tweet provokes a firestorm, as if 140 characters were all it took to change the world."

    "The mid-level stages of TDS have a profound effect on the victim's vocabulary: Sufferers speak a distinctive language consisting solely of hyperbole."

    "As TDS progresses, the afflicted lose the ability to distinguish fantasy
    from reality."

    The Point here is simple: TDS is, in the eyes of its adherents, the knee-jerk opposition from liberals to anything and everything Trump does. If Trump announced he was donating every dollar he's ever made, TDS sufferers would suggest he was up to something nefarious, according to the logic of TDS. There's nothing - not. one. thing. - that Trump could do or say that would be received positively by TDS'ers.

    The history of Trump Derangement Syndrome actually goes back to the early 2000s - a time when the idea of Trump as president was a punch line for late- night comics and nothing more.

    Wikipedia traces its roots to "Bush Derangement Syndrome" - a term first coined by the late conservative columnist Charles Krauthammer back in 2003. The condition, as Krauthammer defined it, was "the acute onset of paranoia in otherwise normal people in reaction to the policies, the presidency - nay - the very existence of George W. Bush."
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-FreeBSD NewsLink 1.2
  • From pothead@pothead@snakebite.com to alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.democrats,talk.politics.misc on Sun Apr 19 04:33:58 2026
    From Newsgroup: talk.politics.misc

    AlleyCat wrote:


    On Sun, 19 Apr 2026 02:15:54 +0000, Mitchell Holman says...

    False dichotomy.



    But at least he didn't go into
    his "well, what about Biden" escape...

    You mean the exact same way you liberals went, "well, what about Trump"
    when Biden was president?

    I can't believe you guys are being that fucking hypocritical in
    projecting what YOU did. You faggots did the exact same thing you're
    whining about now .

    I have the receipts, do you wanna see them?

    How many would you like to see?

    Ya... thought so.

    ========================================================================== >===

    "Trump Derangement Syndrome" Is a Real Mental Condition

    All you need to know about "Trump Derangement Syndrome," or TDS.

    "Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) is a mental condition in which a person
    has been driven effectively insane due to their dislike of Donald Trump,
    to the point at which they will abandon all logic and reason."

    Justin Raimondo, the editorial director of Antiwar.com, wrote a piece in
    the Los Angeles Times in 2016 that broke TDS down into three distinct
    phases or stages:

    "In the first stage of the disease, victims lose all sense of proportion.
    The president-elect's every tweet provokes a firestorm, as if 140
    characters were all it took to change the world."

    "The mid-level stages of TDS have a profound effect on the victim's >vocabulary: Sufferers speak a distinctive language consisting solely of >hyperbole."

    "As TDS progresses, the afflicted lose the ability to distinguish fantasy >from reality."

    The Point here is simple: TDS is, in the eyes of its adherents, the
    knee-jerk opposition from liberals to anything and everything Trump does.
    If Trump announced he was donating every dollar he's ever made, TDS
    sufferers would suggest he was up to something nefarious, according to
    the logic of TDS. There's nothing - not. one. thing. - that Trump could
    do or say that would be received positively by TDS'ers.

    The history of Trump Derangement Syndrome actually goes back to the early >2000s - a time when the idea of Trump as president was a punch line for
    late- night comics and nothing more.

    Wikipedia traces its roots to "Bush Derangement Syndrome" - a term first >coined by the late conservative columnist Charles Krauthammer back in
    2003. The condition, as Krauthammer defined it, was "the acute onset of >paranoia in otherwise normal people in reaction to the policies, the >presidency - nay - the very existence of George W. Bush."


    Christians shouldn't pay taxes.
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-FreeBSD NewsLink 1.2
  • From pothead@pothead@snakebite.com to alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.democrats,talk.politics.misc on Sun Apr 19 13:43:23 2026
    From Newsgroup: talk.politics.misc

    On 2026-04-19, AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Sun, 19 Apr 2026 02:15:54 +0000, Mitchell Holman says...

    False dichotomy.



    But at least he didn't go into
    his "well, what about Biden" escape...

    You mean the exact same way you liberals went, "well, what about Trump" when Biden was president?

    I can't believe you guys are being that fucking hypocritical in projecting what YOU did. You faggots did the exact same thing you're whining about now .

    I have the receipts, do you wanna see them?

    How many would you like to see?

    Ya... thought so.


    Actually I find it hilarious. The leftists spew out something about Trump or republicans but when a comparison to another POTUS or democrat is mentioned
    as a COMPARISON, they go bonkers.

    So how is a rebuttal supposed to occur without a comparison?
    That would be a "you are correct, I agree" or "you are wrong, I disagree" conversation
    which would end at that point.

    At least for me, it's not an attempt to change the topic to Biden, but a simple comparison.
    Would you rather me use George Washington instead?

    The leftists desperately want Biden, his legacy, his disastrous presidency to just go away and disappear because it is highly embarrassing to their party.

    And what is ironic, as well as hilarious, is that the left has been playing this
    TDS influenced game since Trump announced his candidacy at Trump Tower and it's been non-stop ever since.

    The same is true for the media.
    When Biden was POTUS, the MSM continued with Trump, Trump, Trump 24x7 and rarely made a peep about Biden in comparison.

    The left is truly afraid of their socialist, Marxist ideology being exposed
    and there is no other viable reason for their current behavior.
    --
    pothead

    "Nothing rankles a Democrat elitist like seeing a former
    blue collar worker rise to someone who has built their own
    successful business and enjoying the fruits of their labor.
    They deeply resent and disdain people like that because liberals
    feel they are socially and academically superior to them
    and therefore undeserving of such success."

    -- Author Unknown


    --- Synchronet 3.21f-FreeBSD NewsLink 1.2
  • From Casey Bridges@epsstein@maga.gop to alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.democrats,talk.politics.misc on Sun Apr 19 13:49:09 2026
    From Newsgroup: talk.politics.misc

    pothead wrote:

    Actually I find it hilarious. The leftists spew out something about Trump
    or
    republicans but when a comparison to another POTUS or democrat is
    mentioned
    as a COMPARISON, they go bonkers.


    Leftists hate Trump. Everything they think is wrong.



    California's economy is larger than the United Kingdom's. New York sits at
    the center of global finance. Massachusetts, Washington, Oregon, and other
    blue states collectively represent over 60% of America's GDP. In short,
    the engine that powers the United States economy is overwhelmingly powered
    by blue states.

    And yet, the states most dependent on federal welfare, subsidies, and tax redistribution are overwhelmingly Republican. These states drain resources
    from the federal government while exerting disproportionate political
    influence over how it operates.

    Top Three Takeaways from the Article:

    Republican-led states are net takers – relying heavily on federal dollars
    to run their states that come mostly from blue state taxpayers.

    Political representation is skewed – giving resource-draining red states disproportionate power over national policy.

    Blue states could push back – through interstate coordination, selective compliance, or even secession threats, forcing a reckoning over who truly sustains America.
    Red States as Welfare States

    Look at the numbers: states like Mississippi, West Virginia, Alabama, and Kentucky consistently receive far more in federal spending than they
    contribute in taxes. Mississippi receives about $2.13 in federal money for every $1 it sends to Washington. Meanwhile, states like California and New
    York send billions more to the federal government than they get back.

    This means that the so-called "fiscally conservative" states are, in
    reality, welfare states propped up by the wealth generated in blue states. Without blue state subsidies, many red state governments would collapse
    under the weight of their poverty rates, infrastructure needs, and
    healthcare costs.
    Political Power Without Economic Weight

    Despite their dependency, red states hold outsized political power. The
    Senate grants Wyoming's 580,000 residents the same representation as California's 39 million. The Electoral College system compounds this
    imbalance, handing disproportionate influence to rural states that
    contribute relatively little to national economic output.

    In practice, this means red states that drain federal resources wield veto power over national policy. The states most reliant on federal welfare
    dollars are the ones most aggressively blocking climate legislation,
    healthcare reform, and education funding that the rest of the country desperately needs.

    What Blue States Could Do

    The imbalance raises a provocative question: what if blue states stopped playing along?

    Blue states already experiment with interstate compacts, such as climate agreements formed when Trump pulled the U. S. out of the Paris Accord. But
    the options go much further:

    Selective compliance with federal laws, much like Northern states
    resisted fugitive slave laws in the 1850s.

    Irish Democracy–style passive resistance, where millions quietly stop cooperating with federal overreach.

    Economic independence, with state-level initiatives in healthcare,
    immigration policy, and even currency.

    If pushed far enough, some argue that blue states could even explore the possibility of secession, not as political theater but as a credible negotiating tactic. After all, Quebec nearly left Canada twice, and each
    time it forced major concessions.

    The Harsh Truth

    At the heart of the issue lies an uncomfortable reality: the red state
    vision of America – one of social conservatism, weak social safety nets,
    and corporate dominance – is subsidized by the very blue states they
    attack as "socialist. "

    The U. S. has two incompatible futures. One is a multi-ethnic democracy
    with robust public institutions. The other is a regressive, exclusionary
    system kept afloat only by federal redistribution. The former is paying
    for the latter – and sooner or later, blue states may decide the cost is
    too high.
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-FreeBSD NewsLink 1.2
  • From Mitchell Holman@noemail@aol.com to alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.democrats,talk.politics.misc on Sun Apr 19 14:27:18 2026
    From Newsgroup: talk.politics.misc

    pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in news:10s1lvm$13oiv$5@news.tcpreset.net:




    Christians shouldn't pay taxes.




    "Obey the government , for God is the one
    who has put it there. There is no government
    anywhere that God has not placed in power.
    So those who refuse to obey the laws of the
    land are refusing to obey God, and punishment
    will follow."
    Romans 13:1-4



    --- Synchronet 3.21f-FreeBSD NewsLink 1.2
  • From Anonymous@anon@anon.net to alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.democrats,talk.politics.misc on Sun Apr 19 23:23:34 2026
    From Newsgroup: talk.politics.misc

    Mitchell Holman wrote:
    pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in news:10s1lvm$13oiv$5@news.tcpreset.net:




    Christians shouldn't pay taxes.




    "Obey the government , for God is the one
    who has put it there. There is no government
    anywhere that God has not placed in power.
    So those who refuse to obey the laws of the
    land are refusing to obey God, and punishment
    will follow."
    Romans 13:1-4




    Out of context faggotry, as usual.

    Saint Paul was killed for DISOBEYING the government.
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-FreeBSD NewsLink 1.2