|
| 'People are trying to be creative': Tariff-battered
| American companies are so cash-starved they are using
| refund claims as collateral for loans
| ...
<https://finance.yahoo.com/economy/policy/articles/people-trying-creative-tariff-battered-081000028.html>
--bks
On Tue, 14 Apr 2026 11:06:39 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.
Sherman) wrote:
|
| 'People are trying to be creative': Tariff-battered
| American companies are so cash-starved they are using
| refund claims as collateral for loans
| ...
<https://finance.yahoo.com/economy/policy/articles/people-trying-creative-tariff-battered-081000028.html>
--bks
What you didn't quote:
"U.S. importers—who have shouldered the brunt of the tariffs—are now waiting to receive an estimated $166 billion in refunds on the levies.
But, battered by supply-chain woes as a result of the import tax,
hiked energy prices thanks to the Iran war, and nervous consumers
bracing for recession, many large companies are scrambling for cash."
Your claim was the costs were passed to consumers so they lost
NOTHING.l Seems like "corporate greed" is at work. You're against
that right???
Right????
On Tue, 14 Apr 2026 11:06:39 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.
Sherman) wrote:
|
| 'People are trying to be creative': Tariff-battered
| American companies are so cash-starved they are using
| refund claims as collateral for loans
| ...
<https://finance.yahoo.com/economy/policy/articles/people-trying-creative-tariff-battered-081000028.html>
--bks
What you didn't quote:
"U.S. importers—who have shouldered the brunt of the tariffs—are now waiting to receive an estimated $166 billion in refunds on the levies.
But, battered by supply-chain woes as a result of the import tax,
hiked energy prices thanks to the Iran war, and nervous consumers
bracing for recession, many large companies are scrambling for cash."
Your claim was the costs were passed to consumers so they lost
NOTHING.l Seems like "corporate greed" is at work. You're against
that right???
Right????
NoBody wrote:
On Tue, 14 Apr 2026 11:06:39 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.These companies "ate" the tariffs. It's not often that you hear
Sherman) wrote:
|
| 'People are trying to be creative': Tariff-battered
| American companies are so cash-starved they are using
| refund claims as collateral for loans
| ...
<https://finance.yahoo.com/economy/policy/articles/people-trying-crea
tive-tariff-battered-081000028.html>
--bks
What you didn't quote:
"U.S. importers—who have shouldered the brunt of the tariffs—are
now waiting to receive an estimated $166 billion in refunds on the
levies. But, battered by supply-chain woes as a result of the import
tax, hiked energy prices thanks to the Iran war, and nervous
consumers bracing for recession, many large companies are scrambling
for cash."
Your claim was the costs were passed to consumers so they lost
NOTHING.l Seems like "corporate greed" is at work. You're against
that right???
Right????
liberals commenting on such. $166 billion is quite a lot though for
them to sweep under the rug. Just wait and watch, they will continue
to say that the people bore the entire cost of the tariffs again and
again because they don't care to gain an economics background.
phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote in
news:n49g6fFl20sU7@mid.individual.net:
NoBody wrote:
On Tue, 14 Apr 2026 11:06:39 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.These companies "ate" the tariffs. It's not often that you hear
Sherman) wrote:
|
| 'People are trying to be creative': Tariff-battered
| American companies are so cash-starved they are using
| refund claims as collateral for loans
| ...
<https://finance.yahoo.com/economy/policy/articles/people-trying-crea
tive-tariff-battered-081000028.html>
--bks
What you didn't quote:
"U.S. importersâ€â€who have shouldered the brunt of the tariffsâ€â€are
now waiting to receive an estimated $166 billion in refunds on the
levies. But, battered by supply-chain woes as a result of the import
tax, hiked energy prices thanks to the Iran war, and nervous
consumers bracing for recession, many large companies are scrambling
for cash."
Your claim was the costs were passed to consumers so they lost
NOTHING.l Seems like "corporate greed" is at work. You're against
that right???
Right????
liberals commenting on such. $166 billion is quite a lot though for
them to sweep under the rug. Just wait and watch, they will continue
to say that the people bore the entire cost of the tariffs again and
again because they don't care to gain an economics background.
No stockholders will permit a company
to continually lose profits to appease a
president. They at least have to put
forward a plan recoup these loses or face
a shareholder revolt.
U.S. Companies Increasingly Passing Tariff Costs on to Consumers
April 2, 2026
"The burden of tariffs has now moved squarely onto
the consumer," said Brian Higgins, U.S. sector leader
for Industrial Manufacturing at KPMG U.S., in a press
release. "While businesses absorbed the initial shock
to their margins, the overwhelming majority are now
reshaping their pricing models for a trade environment
where cost pressures are the new constant."
https://sgbonline.com/kpmg-survey-u-s-companies-increasingly-passing-on- tariff-costs-to-consumers/
Mitchell Holman wrote:
phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote in
news:n49g6fFl20sU7@mid.individual.net:
NoBody wrote:
On Tue, 14 Apr 2026 11:06:39 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.These companies "ate" the tariffs. It's not often that you hear
Sherman) wrote:
|
| 'People are trying to be creative': Tariff-battered
| American companies are so cash-starved they are using
| refund claims as collateral for loans
| ...
<https://finance.yahoo.com/economy/policy/articles/people-trying-cr
ea tive-tariff-battered-081000028.html>
--bks
What you didn't quote:
"U.S. importersâ€â€who have shouldered the brunt of the
tariffsâ€â€are now waiting to receive an estimated $166 billion
in refunds on the levies. But, battered by supply-chain woes as a
result of the import tax, hiked energy prices thanks to the Iran
war, and nervous consumers bracing for recession, many large
companies are scrambling for cash."
Your claim was the costs were passed to consumers so they lost
NOTHING.l Seems like "corporate greed" is at work. You're against
that right???
Right????
liberals commenting on such. $166 billion is quite a lot though for
them to sweep under the rug. Just wait and watch, they will continue
to say that the people bore the entire cost of the tariffs again and
again because they don't care to gain an economics background.
No stockholders will permit a company
to continually lose profits to appease a
president. They at least have to put
forward a plan recoup these loses or face
a shareholder revolt.
U.S. Companies Increasingly Passing Tariff Costs on to Consumers
April 2, 2026
"The burden of tariffs has now moved squarely onto
the consumer," said Brian Higgins, U.S. sector leader
for Industrial Manufacturing at KPMG U.S., in a press
release. "While businesses absorbed the initial shock
to their margins, the overwhelming majority are now
reshaping their pricing models for a trade environment
where cost pressures are the new constant."
https://sgbonline.com/kpmg-survey-u-s-companies-increasingly-passing-o
n- tariff-costs-to-consumers/
Note that that's "Industrial Manufacturing," such as where the price
of steel was tariffed along with wood and some other construction
materials. I think this guy was only talking about in the Industrial Manufacturing area, not like Wal-Mart, which sees a lot more customers
and kept prices low.
The idea is that the companies are already profitable and tariffs
won't break their bank. Do you have any information on how much for
example, Wal-Mart's costs went up from the tariffs? That percentage
might be an interesting number to this conversation, because I am
claiming it was smallish, but perhaps I am wrong.
However, I admit there were quite a few bankruptcies, probably from companies that never had a concrete plan on how to deal with the
tariffs, most likely run by liberals who didn't understand economics.
phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote incr
news:n49ku3Fls9kU1@mid.individual.net:
Mitchell Holman wrote:
phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote in
news:n49g6fFl20sU7@mid.individual.net:
NoBody wrote:
On Tue, 14 Apr 2026 11:06:39 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.
Sherman) wrote:
|
| 'People are trying to be creative': Tariff-battered
| American companies are so cash-starved they are using
| refund claims as collateral for loans
| ...
<https://finance.yahoo.com/economy/policy/articles/people-trying-
oThese companies "ate" the tariffs. It's not often that you hearea tive-tariff-battered-081000028.html>
--bks
What you didn't quote:
"U.S. importersâ€â€who have shouldered the brunt of the
tariffsâ€â€are now waiting to receive an estimated $166 billion
in refunds on the levies. But, battered by supply-chain woes as a
result of the import tax, hiked energy prices thanks to the Iran
war, and nervous consumers bracing for recession, many large
companies are scrambling for cash."
Your claim was the costs were passed to consumers so they lost
NOTHING.l Seems like "corporate greed" is at work. You're against
that right???
Right????
liberals commenting on such. $166 billion is quite a lot though for
them to sweep under the rug. Just wait and watch, they will continue
to say that the people bore the entire cost of the tariffs again and
again because they don't care to gain an economics background.
No stockholders will permit a company
to continually lose profits to appease a
president. They at least have to put
forward a plan recoup these loses or face
a shareholder revolt.
U.S. Companies Increasingly Passing Tariff Costs on to Consumers
April 2, 2026
"The burden of tariffs has now moved squarely onto
the consumer," said Brian Higgins, U.S. sector leader
for Industrial Manufacturing at KPMG U.S., in a press
release. "While businesses absorbed the initial shock
to their margins, the overwhelming majority are now
reshaping their pricing models for a trade environment
where cost pressures are the new constant."
https://sgbonline.com/kpmg-survey-u-s-companies-increasingly-passing-
n- tariff-costs-to-consumers/
Note that that's "Industrial Manufacturing," such as where the price
of steel was tariffed along with wood and some other construction
materials. I think this guy was only talking about in the Industrial
Manufacturing area, not like Wal-Mart, which sees a lot more customers
and kept prices low.
The idea is that the companies are already profitable and tariffs
won't break their bank. Do you have any information on how much for
example, Wal-Mart's costs went up from the tariffs? That percentage
might be an interesting number to this conversation, because I am
claiming it was smallish, but perhaps I am wrong.
However, I admit there were quite a few bankruptcies, probably from
companies that never had a concrete plan on how to deal with the
tariffs, most likely run by liberals who didn't understand economics.
I rather doubt any company "run by liberals"
would let themselves be ruined by accepting the
tariff losses to protect Trump.
On Tue, 14 Apr 2026 11:06:39 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.
Sherman) wrote:
|
| 'People are trying to be creative': Tariff-battered
| American companies are so cash-starved they are using
| refund claims as collateral for loans
| ... >><https://finance.yahoo.com/economy/policy/articles/people-trying-creative-tariff-battered-081000028.html>
--bks
What you didn't quote:
"U.S. importers—who have shouldered the brunt of the tariffs—are now
waiting to receive an estimated $166 billion in refunds on the levies.
But, battered by supply-chain woes as a result of the import tax,
hiked energy prices thanks to the Iran war, and nervous consumers
bracing for recession, many large companies are scrambling for cash."
Your claim was the costs were passed to consumers so they lost
NOTHING.l Seems like "corporate greed" is at work. You're against
that right???
Right????
phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote in
news:n49ku3Fls9kU1@mid.individual.net:
Mitchell Holman wrote:
phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote in
news:n49g6fFl20sU7@mid.individual.net:
NoBody wrote:
On Tue, 14 Apr 2026 11:06:39 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.These companies "ate" the tariffs. It's not often that you hear
Sherman) wrote:
|
| 'People are trying to be creative': Tariff-battered
| American companies are so cash-starved they are using
| refund claims as collateral for loans
| ...
<https://finance.yahoo.com/economy/policy/articles/people-trying-cr >>>>>> ea tive-tariff-battered-081000028.html>
--bks
What you didn't quote:
"U.S. importersâ€â€Âwho have shouldered the brunt of the >>>>> tariffsâ€â€Âare now waiting to receive an estimated $166 billion
in refunds on the levies. But, battered by supply-chain woes as a
result of the import tax, hiked energy prices thanks to the Iran
war, and nervous consumers bracing for recession, many large
companies are scrambling for cash."
Your claim was the costs were passed to consumers so they lost
NOTHING.l Seems like "corporate greed" is at work. You're against
that right???
Right????
liberals commenting on such. $166 billion is quite a lot though for
them to sweep under the rug. Just wait and watch, they will continue
to say that the people bore the entire cost of the tariffs again and
again because they don't care to gain an economics background.
No stockholders will permit a company
to continually lose profits to appease a
president. They at least have to put
forward a plan recoup these loses or face
a shareholder revolt.
U.S. Companies Increasingly Passing Tariff Costs on to Consumers
April 2, 2026
"The burden of tariffs has now moved squarely onto
the consumer," said Brian Higgins, U.S. sector leader
for Industrial Manufacturing at KPMG U.S., in a press
release. "While businesses absorbed the initial shock
to their margins, the overwhelming majority are now
reshaping their pricing models for a trade environment
where cost pressures are the new constant."
https://sgbonline.com/kpmg-survey-u-s-companies-increasingly-passing-o
n- tariff-costs-to-consumers/
Note that that's "Industrial Manufacturing," such as where the price
of steel was tariffed along with wood and some other construction
materials. I think this guy was only talking about in the Industrial
Manufacturing area, not like Wal-Mart, which sees a lot more customers
and kept prices low.
The idea is that the companies are already profitable and tariffs
won't break their bank. Do you have any information on how much for
example, Wal-Mart's costs went up from the tariffs? That percentage
might be an interesting number to this conversation, because I am
claiming it was smallish, but perhaps I am wrong.
However, I admit there were quite a few bankruptcies, probably from
companies that never had a concrete plan on how to deal with the
tariffs, most likely run by liberals who didn't understand economics.
I rather doubt any company "run by liberals"
would let themselves be ruined by accepting the
tariff losses to protect Trump.
And the biggest block of businesses being
ruined by Trump's tariffs are farmers who, as
you have to admit, are hardly liberals.
Mitchell Holman wrote:
phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote in
news:n49ku3Fls9kU1@mid.individual.net:
Mitchell Holman wrote:
phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote in
news:n49g6fFl20sU7@mid.individual.net:
NoBody wrote:
On Tue, 14 Apr 2026 11:06:39 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (BradleyThese companies "ate" the tariffs. It's not often that you hear
K. Sherman) wrote:
|
| 'People are trying to be creative': Tariff-battered
| American companies are so cash-starved they are using
| refund claims as collateral for loans
| ...
<https://finance.yahoo.com/economy/policy/articles/people-trying- >>>>>>> cr ea tive-tariff-battered-081000028.html>
--bks
What you didn't quote:
"U.S. importersâ€â€Âwho have shouldered the brunt of
the tariffsâ€â€Âare now waiting to receive an
estimated $166 billion in refunds on the levies. But, battered by
supply-chain woes as a result of the import tax, hiked energy
prices thanks to the Iran war, and nervous consumers bracing for
recession, many large companies are scrambling for cash."
Your claim was the costs were passed to consumers so they lost
NOTHING.l Seems like "corporate greed" is at work. You're
against that right???
Right????
liberals commenting on such. $166 billion is quite a lot though
for them to sweep under the rug. Just wait and watch, they will
continue to say that the people bore the entire cost of the
tariffs again and again because they don't care to gain an
economics background.
No stockholders will permit a company
to continually lose profits to appease a
president. They at least have to put
forward a plan recoup these loses or face
a shareholder revolt.
U.S. Companies Increasingly Passing Tariff Costs on to Consumers
April 2, 2026
"The burden of tariffs has now moved squarely onto
the consumer," said Brian Higgins, U.S. sector leader
for Industrial Manufacturing at KPMG U.S., in a press
release. "While businesses absorbed the initial shock
to their margins, the overwhelming majority are now
reshaping their pricing models for a trade environment
where cost pressures are the new constant."
https://sgbonline.com/kpmg-survey-u-s-companies-increasingly-passing
-o n- tariff-costs-to-consumers/
Note that that's "Industrial Manufacturing," such as where the price
of steel was tariffed along with wood and some other construction
materials. I think this guy was only talking about in the Industrial
Manufacturing area, not like Wal-Mart, which sees a lot more
customers and kept prices low.
The idea is that the companies are already profitable and tariffs
won't break their bank. Do you have any information on how much for
example, Wal-Mart's costs went up from the tariffs? That percentage
might be an interesting number to this conversation, because I am
claiming it was smallish, but perhaps I am wrong.
However, I admit there were quite a few bankruptcies, probably from
companies that never had a concrete plan on how to deal with the
tariffs, most likely run by liberals who didn't understand
economics.
I rather doubt any company "run by liberals"
would let themselves be ruined by accepting the
tariff losses to protect Trump.
And the biggest block of businesses being
ruined by Trump's tariffs are farmers who, as
you have to admit, are hardly liberals.
Don't you mean "hardy" liberals, because of the socialism that props
them up with subsidies? Every year tens of billions of dollars is
funneled from the regular economy to farmers because it's not
profitable but evidently, necessary. Meanwhile hundreds of billions of vegetables go to waste. Something's wrong. Why do we need this
socialist solution in this capitalist country?
phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote in
news:n4c23iF3io7U2@mid.individual.net:
Mitchell Holman wrote:
phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote in
news:n49ku3Fls9kU1@mid.individual.net:
Mitchell Holman wrote:
phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote in
news:n49g6fFl20sU7@mid.individual.net:
NoBody wrote:
On Tue, 14 Apr 2026 11:06:39 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley >>>>>>> K. Sherman) wrote:These companies "ate" the tariffs. It's not often that you hear
|
| 'People are trying to be creative': Tariff-battered
| American companies are so cash-starved they are using
| refund claims as collateral for loans
| ...
<https://finance.yahoo.com/economy/policy/articles/people-trying- >>>>>>>> cr ea tive-tariff-battered-081000028.html>
--bks
What you didn't quote:
"U.S. importersâ€â€ÂÂwho have shouldered the brunt of
the tariffsâ€â€ÂÂare now waiting to receive an
estimated $166 billion in refunds on the levies. But, battered by >>>>>>> supply-chain woes as a result of the import tax, hiked energy
prices thanks to the Iran war, and nervous consumers bracing for >>>>>>> recession, many large companies are scrambling for cash."
Your claim was the costs were passed to consumers so they lost
NOTHING.l Seems like "corporate greed" is at work. You're
against that right???
Right????
liberals commenting on such. $166 billion is quite a lot though
for them to sweep under the rug. Just wait and watch, they will
continue to say that the people bore the entire cost of the
tariffs again and again because they don't care to gain an
economics background.
No stockholders will permit a company
to continually lose profits to appease a
president. They at least have to put
forward a plan recoup these loses or face
a shareholder revolt.
U.S. Companies Increasingly Passing Tariff Costs on to Consumers
April 2, 2026
"The burden of tariffs has now moved squarely onto
the consumer," said Brian Higgins, U.S. sector leader
for Industrial Manufacturing at KPMG U.S., in a press
release. "While businesses absorbed the initial shock
to their margins, the overwhelming majority are now
reshaping their pricing models for a trade environment
where cost pressures are the new constant."
https://sgbonline.com/kpmg-survey-u-s-companies-increasingly-passing >>>>> -o n- tariff-costs-to-consumers/
Note that that's "Industrial Manufacturing," such as where the price
of steel was tariffed along with wood and some other construction
materials. I think this guy was only talking about in the Industrial
Manufacturing area, not like Wal-Mart, which sees a lot more
customers and kept prices low.
The idea is that the companies are already profitable and tariffs
won't break their bank. Do you have any information on how much for
example, Wal-Mart's costs went up from the tariffs? That percentage
might be an interesting number to this conversation, because I am
claiming it was smallish, but perhaps I am wrong.
However, I admit there were quite a few bankruptcies, probably from
companies that never had a concrete plan on how to deal with the
tariffs, most likely run by liberals who didn't understand
economics.
I rather doubt any company "run by liberals"
would let themselves be ruined by accepting the
tariff losses to protect Trump.
And the biggest block of businesses being
ruined by Trump's tariffs are farmers who, as
you have to admit, are hardly liberals.
Don't you mean "hardy" liberals, because of the socialism that props
them up with subsidies? Every year tens of billions of dollars is
funneled from the regular economy to farmers because it's not
profitable but evidently, necessary. Meanwhile hundreds of billions of
vegetables go to waste. Something's wrong. Why do we need this
socialist solution in this capitalist country?
What is your "capitalist" solution?
Mitchell Holman wrote:
phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote in
news:n4c23iF3io7U2@mid.individual.net:
Mitchell Holman wrote:
phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote in
news:n49ku3Fls9kU1@mid.individual.net:
Mitchell Holman wrote:
phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote in
news:n49g6fFl20sU7@mid.individual.net:
NoBody wrote:
On Tue, 14 Apr 2026 11:06:39 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.comThese companies "ate" the tariffs. It's not often that you hear
(Bradley K. Sherman) wrote:
|
| 'People are trying to be creative': Tariff-battered
| American companies are so cash-starved they are using
| refund claims as collateral for loans
| ...
<https://finance.yahoo.com/economy/policy/articles/people-tryin >>>>>>>>> g- cr ea tive-tariff-battered-081000028.html>
--bks
What you didn't quote:
"U.S. importersâ€â€ÂÂwho have
shouldered the brunt of the
tariffsâ€â€ÂÂare now waiting to >>>>>>>> receive an estimated $166 billion in refunds on the levies.
But, battered by supply-chain woes as a result of the import
tax, hiked energy prices thanks to the Iran war, and nervous
consumers bracing for recession, many large companies are
scrambling for cash."
Your claim was the costs were passed to consumers so they lost >>>>>>>> NOTHING.l Seems like "corporate greed" is at work. You're
against that right???
Right????
liberals commenting on such. $166 billion is quite a lot though
for them to sweep under the rug. Just wait and watch, they will
continue to say that the people bore the entire cost of the
tariffs again and again because they don't care to gain an
economics background.
No stockholders will permit a company
to continually lose profits to appease a
president. They at least have to put
forward a plan recoup these loses or face
a shareholder revolt.
U.S. Companies Increasingly Passing Tariff Costs on to Consumers
April 2, 2026
"The burden of tariffs has now moved squarely onto
the consumer," said Brian Higgins, U.S. sector leader
for Industrial Manufacturing at KPMG U.S., in a press
release. "While businesses absorbed the initial shock
to their margins, the overwhelming majority are now
reshaping their pricing models for a trade environment
where cost pressures are the new constant."
https://sgbonline.com/kpmg-survey-u-s-companies-increasingly-passi >>>>>> ng -o n- tariff-costs-to-consumers/
Note that that's "Industrial Manufacturing," such as where the
price of steel was tariffed along with wood and some other
construction materials. I think this guy was only talking about in
the Industrial Manufacturing area, not like Wal-Mart, which sees a
lot more customers and kept prices low.
The idea is that the companies are already profitable and tariffs
won't break their bank. Do you have any information on how much
for example, Wal-Mart's costs went up from the tariffs? That
percentage might be an interesting number to this conversation,
because I am claiming it was smallish, but perhaps I am wrong.
However, I admit there were quite a few bankruptcies, probably
from companies that never had a concrete plan on how to deal with
the tariffs, most likely run by liberals who didn't understand
economics.
I rather doubt any company "run by liberals"
would let themselves be ruined by accepting the
tariff losses to protect Trump.
And the biggest block of businesses being
ruined by Trump's tariffs are farmers who, as
you have to admit, are hardly liberals.
Don't you mean "hardy" liberals, because of the socialism that props
them up with subsidies? Every year tens of billions of dollars is
funneled from the regular economy to farmers because it's not
profitable but evidently, necessary. Meanwhile hundreds of billions
of vegetables go to waste. Something's wrong. Why do we need this
socialist solution in this capitalist country?
What is your "capitalist" solution?
Move to New Zealand and live the New Zealander Dream.
| 'People are trying to be creative': Tariff-battered
| American companies are so cash-starved they are using
| refund claims as collateral for loans
| 'People are trying to be creative': Tariff-battered
| American companies are so cash-starved they are using
| refund claims as collateral for loans
|
| The U.S. government is set to launch an online portal next
| week that lets businesses request refunds for tariffs
| deemed illegal by the Supreme Court. But payouts won't be
| automatic, and legal experts said businesses could face
| other obstacles getting their money back.
| ...
<https://www.cbsnews.com/news/how-to-file-for-tariff-refund/>
--bks
| 'People are trying to be creative': Tariff-battered
| American companies are so cash-starved they are using
| refund claims as collateral for loans
|
| The U.S. government is set to launch an online portal next
| week that lets businesses request refunds for tariffs
| deemed illegal by the Supreme Court. But payouts won't be
| automatic, and legal experts said businesses could face
| other obstacles getting their money back.
| ...
<https://www.cbsnews.com/news/how-to-file-for-tariff-refund/>
--bks
| Sysop: | Jp |
|---|---|
| Location: | Brussels, BE |
| Users: | 2 |
| Nodes: | 4 (0 / 4) |
| Uptime: | 93:45:21 |
| Calls: | 0 |
| Messages: | 35,009 |