• Re: Zugzwang

    From bks@bks@panix.com (Bradley K. Sherman) to talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics on Tue Apr 14 12:27:54 2026
    From Newsgroup: talk.politics.misc

    | Q: Is your expectation other countries will assist in
    | effort to blockade Iran?
    |
    | TRUMP: Yeah. Other countries are gonna also.
    |
    | Q: Which countries, sir?
    |
    | TRUMP: We don't need other countries.

    |
    | NATO allies refuse to join Trump's Strait of Hormuz blockade
    | ... <https://www.channelnewsasia.com/world/nato-allies-refuse-join-us-blockade-strait-hormuz-iran-war-6053661>

    --bks
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-FreeBSD NewsLink 1.2
  • From bks@bks@panix.com (Bradley K. Sherman) to talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics on Sat Apr 18 20:38:53 2026
    From Newsgroup: talk.politics.misc

    |
    | I don't know what has been presented in the White House,
    | but this is the adversary status I would present, with one
    | important Takeaway - At this stage, the most important
    | requirement for U.S. policy is strategic realism about what
    | the use of force can still achieve against Iran.
    |
    | 1. Iran's leadership is not interested in prolonging the
    | war, but it believes it holds an advantage in a "pain
    | tolerance" competition vis-a-vis the United States and the
    | international community.
    |
    | 2. Threats of force are unlikely to produce meaningful
    | concessions in negotiations. Iran is expected to hold
    | firmly to the red lines it has maintained from the outset.
    |
    | 3. Maritime pressure will not compel Iranian capitulation.
    | Absent an agreement, it is more likely to lead to direct
    | confrontation between the U.S. and Iran. Interdictions of
    | Iranian shipping may accelerate escalation, but not
    | surrender.
    |
    | 4. The current Iranian leadership will not give up uranium
    | enrichment, its missile program, support for its regional
    | network of proxies, or its strategic influence over the
    | Strait of Hormuz.
    |
    | 5. Limited strikes will not alter this trajectory. Tehran
    | is not easily swayed by signaling. A broader campaign
    | against Iran's civilian infrastructure could severely
    | damage its economy, but would almost certainly trigger
    | wide-scale retaliation, particularly against energy
    | infrastructure across the Gulf.
    |
    | 6. Without regime change, which would require a dramatic
    | U.S. investment in time, resources, and political will,
    | these core dynamics are unlikely to shift.
    |
    | 7. Decision-making in Iran is becoming more fragmented and
    | hardline, increasingly shaped by the IRGC. This makes
    | coherent compromise more difficult than in the past.
    |
    | 8. What Iran did not concede before or during the conflict,
    | it is even less likely to concede now, regardless of
    | military pressure or blockade measures.
    |
    | 9. In the absence of a deal, escalation is not a risk, it
    | is the default trajectory. Iran is already preparing for
    | it, including efforts to rebuild and reinforce its missile
    | capabilities.
    |
    | 10. To date, even successful operational achievements have
    | not meaningfully changed Iran's strategic calculus.
    | Paradoxically, the campaign has weakened Iran economically,
    | but strengthened the regime internally, especially among
    | the regime supporters.
    |
    | +1
    |
    | The administration seems to have two main options: a
    | framework agreement broadly resembling the previous nuclear
    | deal, Or a wider escalation would impose massive economic
    | costs on Iran, but rather than restrain it, it could drive
    | a significant expansion of its escalatory actions.
    |
    <https://xcancel.com/citrinowicz/status/2045592885362340027>

    --bks
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-FreeBSD NewsLink 1.2
  • From bks@bks@panix.com (Bradley K. Sherman) to talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics on Sat Apr 18 23:52:33 2026
    From Newsgroup: talk.politics.misc

    |
    | Iran Had a Doomsday Weapon All Along
    |
    | Control of a vital waterway gives Tehran the deterrence
    | power it's always wanted.
    | ... <https://www.theatlantic.com/international/2026/04/iran-deterrence-strait-hormuz/686851/>

    --bks
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-FreeBSD NewsLink 1.2
  • From phoenix@j63840576@gmail.com to talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics on Sat Apr 18 18:43:27 2026
    From Newsgroup: talk.politics.misc

    Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
    |
    | Iran Had a Doomsday Weapon All Along
    |
    | Control of a vital waterway gives Tehran the deterrence
    | power it's always wanted.
    | ... <https://www.theatlantic.com/international/2026/04/iran-deterrence-strait-hormuz/686851/>

    --bks


    Of course they have a doomsday / dead man's switch. All they have to do
    is take out Saudi Arabia's desalinization center. It provides crucial
    water to most of the region.
    --
    Pharaoh was so pleased with Hadad that he gave him a
    sister of his own wife, Queen Tahpenes, in marriage.
    The sister of Tahpenes bore him a son named Genubath,
    whom Tahpenes brought up in the royal palace. There
    Genubath lived with Pharaoh’s own children.
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-FreeBSD NewsLink 1.2